Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	83.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181122
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '20 at 05:49
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	64%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135 127,344 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 79.6 2-Core 148 57% 98.1 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 399 40% 326 Pts	64-Core 510 32% 510 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 452.06 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.6% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 26.9 Parallax 31.9 28% 31 fps	MRender 33.2 Gravity 34.3 Splatting 31.8 27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D480G 480GB 4,595 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0410A SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 233 181 179 175 172 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	83.1% Excellent	Read 423 Write 379 Mixed 370 SusWrite 209 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 39.7 120% 39.3 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 135 160% 278 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 83.1% Great: 127%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 983GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 163 172 172 171 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Read 129 Write 165 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 169 97% 133 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.1 93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GB 4,888 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 27.2 MC Write 25.2 MC Mixed 25.1 74% 25.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 15.7 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 108 37% 108 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,978 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	866x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	714x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	543x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	454x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	402x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	202x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $36Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	155x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	149x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	131x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	126x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	114x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $323

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16