Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	179% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	7.81GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7.81GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	5.4 GB free of 7.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 07 '20 at 03:17
Run Duration	122 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD EPYC (with IBPB) 535 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 57.8 1-Core 93.4 2-Core 91.8 51% 81 Pts	4-Core 94.8 8-Core 82.1 12% 88.4 Pts	64-Core 88.1 6% 88.1 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 94%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46 87,206 User benchmarks, average bench 234% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1304 400 402 397 402 403 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	179% Outstanding	Read 2,146 Write 1,845 Mixed 1395 SusWrite 552 331% 1,484 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 67.5 4K Mixed 50.6 163% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 216 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 175 134% 184 MB/s
Poor: 152% ↑ This bench: 179% Great: 302%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 1x7GB 828 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1 of 1 slots used 7GB DIMM RAM Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	56.3% Above average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 24.2 MC Mixed 18.9 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 18 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 134 30% 134 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 121%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16