PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 59% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ (all builds) |
Motherboard | Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ |
Memory | 114.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20191120 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 29 '20 at 03:48 |
Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
70.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 377.11
|
13.8%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Raid 0 Volume 487GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 176 167 177 167 172 MB/s
|
59%
Above average
|
|||
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 129 128 127 128 MB/s
|
73.8%
Very good
|
|||
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$323
3TB free
Firmware: 1L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 145 144 144 145 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-CK0 8x16GB
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
92.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples | 7x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 5x |
CPU:1stBench 70%, 34 samples | 5x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 7x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,306Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 4x |
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples | 3x |
SSD | |
---|---|
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples | 7x |
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples | 3x |
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $234Bench 290%, 10,709 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 109% - Outstanding | Total price: $184 |