Compaq Evo N610c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCompaq Evo N610c  (all builds)
MotherboardCompaq 07F4
Memory0.1 GB free of 0.500977 GB @ 0.1 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20020531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '17 at 19:18
Run Duration1871 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4 Mobile 1.60GHz
J1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.5% Very poor
Memory 31.2
1-Core 12.8
2-Core 12.7
15% 18.9 Pts
4-Core 12.2
8-Core 12.1
2% 12.1 Pts
64-Core 12.8
1% 12.8 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TS64GPSD320 64GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120309 Max speed: UDMA 133 133 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.7% Below average
Read 78.7
Write 26.4
Mixed 30.9
34% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.12
4K Write 0.49
4K Mixed 0.41
310% 2.34 MB/s
Unità disco 1GB
1GB free
Firmware: HDX 3.22 Max speed: Unknown
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.75% Terrible
Read 1.11
Write 1.16
Mixed 1.13
1% 1.13 MB/s
4K Read 0.93
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.13
55% 0.39 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.75%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 33GB
null MHz
256, 256, 33792 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
2.64% Terrible
MC Read 0.8
MC Write 1
MC Mixed 0.1
2% 0.63 GB/s
SC Read 0
SC Write 0
SC Mixed 0
0% 0 GB/s
Latency 248
16% 248 ns
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.64%
Great: 17%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback