Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U759

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U759 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNB2CB
Memory	1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191122
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 25 '20 at 01:51
Run Duration	111 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%
CPU Throttled	90%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8565U 81,207 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 126 2-Core 241 78% 144 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 503 56% 443 Pts	64-Core 481 30% 481 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1E26 0023) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.97% Terrible	Lighting 3.1 Reflection 4.46 Parallax 3.03 2% 3.53 fps	MRender 4.57 Gravity 2.73 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.48 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.97% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV512TDL-1AW15ABFA 512GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: M5MA030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 335 344 341 289 325 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 337 Write 313 Mixed 298 SusWrite 332 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 47.4 4K Mixed 24.6 80% 29.2 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 148 135% 200 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB 96,646 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.5% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 10.4 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 13 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical LIFEBOOK U759 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK U759

CPU
Core i7-8565UIntelBench 55%, 81,207 samples	15x
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	11x
Core i7-8665UIntelBench 60%, 10,156 samples	8x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	35x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-00007 512GBSamsungBench 236%, 335 samples	14x
MZVLB256HAHQ-00007 256GBSamsungBench 184%, 116 samples	4x
MZNLN512HAJQ-00007 512GBSamsungBench 93%, 78 samples	2x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	9x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	8x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16