Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	81.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3225-$325 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 59% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 63.9 2-Core 118 51% 83.4 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 208 26% 200 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% Asus(1043 043B) 2GB CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1150 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 18.3 Reflection 17 Parallax 22.8 15% 19.3 fps	MRender 14.1 Gravity 17.2 Splatting 19 14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 148 148 146 148 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 417 Write 409 Mixed 317 SusWrite 151 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 65.2 4K Mixed 44.7 122% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 324 255% 352 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 115%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 466GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 178 183 181 181 183 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 161 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 180 102% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF 1x8GB 12,132 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	29.9% Poor	MC Read 11.5 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 8.9 29% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 7.1 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 34%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16