Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	17.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-1200 APU 6,904 User benchmarks, average bench 23% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10% Very poor	Memory 16.7 1-Core 14.7 2-Core 26.3 12% 19.2 Pts	4-Core 22 8-Core 11.6 2% 16.8 Pts	64-Core 17.2 1% 17.2 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310 7,882 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2AF0) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	0.82% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.27 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.17 fps	MRender 1.14 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.17 1% 0.99 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.82% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 121 136 112 127 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	17.5% Very poor	Read 154 Write 164 Mixed 206 SusWrite 124 37% 162 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 2.5 13% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 102%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB 2,689 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 349GB free, PID 1f05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 19 20 18 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	8.8% Terrible	Read 15 Write 11.8 Mixed 13.9 SusWrite 18.9 20% 14.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 38% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 8.8% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown S939A2SGS-ITR 16GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1066, 1066 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	6.83% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 2.4 7% 2.4 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 1.1 SC Mixed 1.5 3% 1.17 GB/s	Latency 346 12% 346 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 6.83% Great: 56%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E1-1200 APUAMDBench 23%, 6,904 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 7310AMDBench 1%, 7,882 samples	1x

RAM
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 6,018 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16