Lenovo 80NV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLenovo 80NV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Allsparks 5A
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '20 at 10:25
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 14%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 81.6
2-Core 164
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 317
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 318
21% 318 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960M
Legend(17AA 3802) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5167
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 69.1
Reflection 45
Parallax 65.1
18% 59.7 fps
MRender 52.7
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 39.6
19% 52.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 19%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0B-00YS70 500GB
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 355 374 391 394 396 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 365
Mixed 239
SusWrite 363
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 61.2
4K Mixed 41.4
130% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 241
199% 285 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 114%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
28GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 69 69 72 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 60.7
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 70.2
40% 55.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.4% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 22.7
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 18
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 80NV Builds (Compare 1,685 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80NV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $299Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Extreme 16GB $28
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback