Asus WS X299 PRO_SE

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 120% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	97.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus WS X299 PRO_SE (all builds)
Memory	117.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191003
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 03 '20 at 18:43
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9960X-$1,579 850 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 65.6 1-Core 126 2-Core 242 78% 144 Pts	4-Core 486 8-Core 910 83% 698 Pts	64-Core 2,668 165% 2,668 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Gigabyte(1458 3FFB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.92 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	113% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 158 Parallax 161 119% 155 fps	MRender 184 Gravity 143 Splatting 103 113% 143 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 375 378 371 383 377 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	97.3% Outstanding	Read 422 Write 375 Mixed 363 SusWrite 379 87% 385 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 45.8 143% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 302 216% 283 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 97.3% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 886GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1276 1249 1256 1229 1229 1239 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	266% Outstanding	Read 1,941 Write 1,264 Mixed 1287 SusWrite 1,246 321% 1,435 MB/s	4K Read 61.6 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 83.8 271% 92.6 MB/s	DQ Read 713 DQ Write 517 DQ Mixed 593 449% 608 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 266% Great: 410%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 128 131 121 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 125 Write 122 Mixed 76.4 SusWrite 127 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 83%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 112GB free Firmware: CR100-11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 49 50 50 50 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 58.4 Write 64.5 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 49.2 40% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 44%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89 48,059 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 835GB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 86 88 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 90.6 Write 92.6 Mixed 46.3 SusWrite 87.2 58% 79.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 59%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 106 105 107 108 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 106 Mixed 83.2 SusWrite 106 72% 98 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 83%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1TB free, PID 1230 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 123 122 121 121 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	49.8% Average	Read 114 Write 119 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 121 146% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK128GX4M4A2666C16 4x31.8GB 242 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 4 of 8 slots used 127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	MC Read 30.4 MC Write 48.4 MC Mixed 30.7 104% 36.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 19.6 SC Mixed 8.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 130%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WS X299 PRO_SE Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 172%

UFO

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 186%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 PRO_SE

CPU
Core i9-10900XIntelBench 85%, 6,322 samples	24x
Core i9-9820XIntel $550Bench 82%, 2,515 samples	16x
Core i9-7980XEIntel $1,511Bench 80%, 4,653 samples	13x

GPU
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $630Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	11x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	10x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	11x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	8x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	8x
CMD16GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GTZR CMD16GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GTZR CMD16GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GTZR CMD16GX4M2B3200C16 G.SKILL F4-3000C16-8GTZR 64GBCorsairBench 129%, 8 samples	6x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C14 4x16GBCorsairBench 82%, 25 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $768

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16