HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics48.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP xw8600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory21.7 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120920
Uptime3 Days
Run DateAug 02 '20 at 17:45
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
43% Average
Memory 57.2
1-Core 41.2
2-Core 84.7
38% 61 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 270
26% 213 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.1.3
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 60.1
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 74.8
49% 63.7 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 50.4
47% 58.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$149
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 80 87 121 98 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 177
Write 148
Mixed 112
SusWrite 87.3
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 18.7
4K Mixed 9.9
34% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 65.8
DQ Mixed 67.6
58% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 51%
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
181GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 108 105 103 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 91.3
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 105
65% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 59%
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
94GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 76 75 76 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 90.3
Write 91.2
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 75.4
58% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 59%
Marshal MAL2750S 750GB
512GB free
Firmware: 2B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 59 62 55 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 59.2
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 59.5
41% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Fujitsu MHW2120BH 120GB-$32
100GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 36.4
Write 37.1
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 36.9
25% 33.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 33%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$43
223GB free
Firmware: 1H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 110 119 120 117 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 118
Write 119
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 115
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 65GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 7.7
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $145
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback