PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 81.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T3600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T3600 (all builds) |
Memory | 24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190625 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 01 '20 at 11:45 |
Run Duration | 198 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 26% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
|
31.6%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX300 240GB-$43
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 395 267 99 131 116 MB/s
|
81.3%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
32GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 233 153 136 138 130 MB/s
|
98.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
15.3%
Very poor
|
||||
Seagate M3 1TB
64GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
ST2000DM 006-2DM164 2TB
176GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
12.7%
Very poor
|
|||
ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
279GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 MB/s
|
9.03%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung-00CE M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
92.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,062x |
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 446x |
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples | 237x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 162x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 138x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 117x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |