PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds) |
Memory | 23.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200429 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Jul 31 '20 at 11:12 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | BHR-User |
Background CPU | 90% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
84.4%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$160
226GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 288 253 256 234 241 MB/s
|
68.2%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
107GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 290 92 78 78 78 MB/s
|
56.6%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
888GB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 163 166 166 162 MB/s
|
88.5%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
810GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 140 143 146 141 137 MB/s
|
71.9%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mushkin MR[A/B]4U360JNNM16G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
71.2%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples | 1,300x |
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples | 615x |
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $82Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 582x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 466x |
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples | 381x |
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 355x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $685 |