Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171107
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 31 '20 at 09:12
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 104
2-Core 211
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 343
53% 383 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 39.2
33% 37.4 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 39.2
Splatting 38
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 480GB (2018)-$69
241GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 4.7 57 9.7 6.3 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 431
Write 373
Mixed 261
SusWrite 46.9
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 13.2
48% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 43.7
DQ Write 15.6
DQ Mixed 34.7
24% 31.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
656GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 129 129 129 130 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
71% Very good
Read 119
Write 97
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 127
67% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71%
Great: 110%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
407GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 108 106 108 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 106
Write 106
Mixed 56.8
SusWrite 105
69% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
26GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.1 2.6 4.4 2.4 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Read 24.8
Write 6.8
Mixed 5
SusWrite 3.3
10% 9.97 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 18%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
57GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67.3
Write 44.5
Mixed 16.8
48% 42.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
99% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown V02D4LF8GB5285282133 24GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.9% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 18.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 24.1
SC Mixed 18.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 69.9
57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback