Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '20 at 11:23
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 69.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
87% 164 Pts
4-Core 556
8-Core 874
88% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,059
66% 1,059 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 114
Parallax 234
114% 163 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 135
Splatting 159
114% 136 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 111%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,616
Write 2,011
Mixed 1,620
461% 2,083 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 88.2
303% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 1,091
DQ Mixed 1,148
835% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Seagate ST1000LM010-9YH146 1TB
242GB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 46 45 46 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 64
Write 66
Mixed 41.6
SusWrite 45.1
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
668GB free
Firmware: JE3OA60B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 84 87 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 84.9
Write 83.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 86
52% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 50%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 53 53 54 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 68.1
Write 53.2
Mixed 40.6
SusWrite 53.5
70% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$63
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 27.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 25.3
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $476
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback