Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 12,140 User benchmarks, average bench 34% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	Memory 36.3 1-Core 34.2 2-Core 66.9 27% 45.8 Pts	4-Core 76.9 8-Core 83.8 10% 80.4 Pts	64-Core 83.6 5% 83.6 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 1360) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.12% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 2.04 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.49 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 1.33 Splatting 2.13 2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.12% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1014 256GB 2,257 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 280 253 272 250 255 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 447 Write 400 Mixed 401 SusWrite 268 85% 379 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 41.5 4K Mixed 28.4 84% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 146 120% 172 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 180%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 6.8 20% 7.17 GB/s	SC Read 1.4 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2.6 6% 2.17 GB/s	Latency 220 18% 220 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	223x
Pentium Silver N5030IntelBench 35%, 2,697 samples	90x
Celeron N4120IntelBench 33%, 2,420 samples	52x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	370x
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	122x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ1 128GBKingstonBench 94%, 4,828 samples	81x
OM8PDP3128B-AA1 128GBKingstonBench 107%, 304 samples	61x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	47x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16