PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Gigabyte Z170X-UD5 |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-Z170X-UD5-CF (all builds) |
Memory | 54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색 |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170306 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 14 '20 at 17:31 |
Run Duration | 179 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 19% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
55.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 451.48
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
62.3%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 267 92 101 95 97 96 MB/s
|
77.8%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
217GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 30 30 32 40 MB/s
|
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Samsung Portable SSD T1 250GB
7GB free
Firmware: 0
|
||||
Revuahn NX2200 1TB
133GB free
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 643 340 248 195 203 268 MB/s
|
89.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
67.9%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 292x |
Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 73x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 48x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 71x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 27x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 22x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 95% - Outstanding | Total price: $463 |