Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (98%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C855-29L (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130717
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 13 '20 at 11:30
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	98%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium B960 13,355 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Memory 58.6 1-Core 17.1 2-Core 35.7 28% 37.1 Pts	4-Core 38.9 8-Core 38.1 5% 38.5 Pts	64-Core 40.9 2% 40.9 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 470GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX003M SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 99 94 89 83 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 2.7 Write 3.2 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 89.7 21% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 62%
Kingston DT microDuo 8GB 805 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 16a1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 1.8 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 10.9 Write 14.7 SusWrite 4 12% 9.87 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GB 5,165 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.6% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 8.7 23% 7.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.5 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16