Asus F3Sv

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus F3Sv  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK F3Sv
Memory1.6 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280x800x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 07:10
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T7300-$90
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 46.3
34% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 44.6
8-Core 46
6% 45.3 Pts
64-Core 45.2
3% 45.2 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600M GS
Asus(1043 1514) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.96% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.92
Parallax 0.22
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.96%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 80 45 27 126 92 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 223
Write 200
Mixed 174
SusWrite 93.8
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 20.7
4K Mixed 9.4
47% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 34.2
DQ Mixed 28.1
32% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.6
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback