Asus A55BM-E

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus A55BM-E (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151215
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '20 at 20:39
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	75%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 870K 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 46% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Memory 53.3 1-Core 29.4 2-Core 98.1 36% 60.3 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 136 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 852D) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.03% Terrible	Lighting 1.03 Reflection 2.35 Parallax 0.47 1% 1.28 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 0.87 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.71 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.03% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 135 117 123 125 125 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.8% Above average	Read 208 Write 202 Mixed 178 SusWrite 136 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 31.2 92% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 159 118% 154 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 110%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 70GB free Firmware: CS900612 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 169 53 56 56 54 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.4% Average	Read 183 Write 150 Mixed 148 SusWrite 95.8 32% 144 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 20.5 76% 27.7 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 125 102% 145 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.7 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 4.9 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A55BM-E Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55BM-E

CPU
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	17x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	17x
A4-4000 APUAMD $171Bench 39%, 6,528 samples	12x

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	11x
Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples	7x
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Ultra Plus 256GBSanDisk $139Bench 81%, 17,545 samples	4x
AS340 120GBApacerBench 67%, 5,956 samples	3x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	50x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	22x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $116

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16