Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GD
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180713
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '20 at 09:35
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	4%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 82.2 2-Core 137 65% 104 Pts	4-Core 156 8-Core 215 23% 186 Pts	64-Core 207 13% 207 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% Asus(1043 10C1) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5148 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Lighting 21.4 Reflection 19.8 Parallax 22.5 17% 21.2 fps	MRender 32.2 Gravity 19.8 Splatting 19.6 19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB 18,233 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 42GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.C SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 43 47 51 56 46 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Read 520 Write 320 Mixed 402 SusWrite 76.8 73% 330 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 56.2 4K Mixed 32.8 111% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 135 119% 184 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 115%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56 127,507 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 338GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 54 52 51 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 24.1 Write 68.3 Mixed 48.8 SusWrite 52.3 36% 48.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 94% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	59.6% Above average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 22.3 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 23 SC Mixed 20.3 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 63.5 63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD Builds (Compare 2,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GD_FX80GD

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1,692x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	919x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,555x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,055x
RX 5700-XTAMD $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	324x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	120x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	109x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	874x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	220x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	80x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16