HP 2000 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 15%
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 2000 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3577
Memory3.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110727
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 21:57
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16% Very poor
Memory 27.3
1-Core 17.7
2-Core 30.4
17% 25.1 Pts
4-Core 28.3
8-Core 28.4
4% 28.3 Pts
64-Core 26.9
2% 26.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6320
HP(103C 3577) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
0.67% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3
Parallax 4.6
1% 3.53 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.1
1% 2.6 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.67%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 35 36 32 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 58.8
Write 49.7
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 37.3
33% 44.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston TSB1066D3S7ELF/2G Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 6GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.35% Terrible
MC Read 1.7
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 2.3
6% 1.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1.5
5% 1.7 GB/s
Latency 271
15% 271 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 2000 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 25%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 2000 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Poor Total price: $115
The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $151Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $325Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback