Hp-pavilion KP310AA-ABU a6455.uk

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 18%
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemHp-pavilion KP310AA-ABU a6455.uk  (all builds)
MotherboardOEM_MB NARRA3
Memory1.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080502
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 19:02
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Phenom 9500
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28% Poor
Memory 29.7
1-Core 39.6
2-Core 79.3
28% 49.5 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 144
20% 149 Pts
64-Core 149
10% 149 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400
Asus(1043 0510) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.27
Parallax 0.25
0% 0.72 fps
MRender 1.95
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.87
0% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDP725050GLA 500GB
381GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 34 11 17 11 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Read 77.9
Write 75.4
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 17.1
40% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 512, 512 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 5.4
MC Mixed 7.9
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.9
11% 3.73 GB/s
Latency 256
16% 256 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical KP310AA-ABU a6455.uk Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop 14%
Tree trunk
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KP310AA-ABU a6455.uk

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback