Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA
Memory	9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120228
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 30 '20 at 12:29
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	9%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 65.1 2-Core 99.7 54% 82.4 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 136 18% 138 Pts	64-Core 132 8% 132 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C606) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 1.57 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 1.06 1% 1.65 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 2.65 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 235 236 235 238 235 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.4% Good	Read 248 Write 239 Mixed 212 SusWrite 236 53% 234 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 29.4 97% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 199 150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 124%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 32GB 4,247 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 23GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.8 8.7 9.4 9.3 8.2 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	7.4% Terrible	Read 30 Write 15.3 Mixed 12.4 SusWrite 8.8 20% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.5 67% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 7.4% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DM0-YK0 M471B5273CH0-CH9 12GB 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.7% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 13.2 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 76.2 52% 76.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4A/300E5A/300E7A/3430EA/3530EA

CPU
Core i5-2450MIntel $225Bench 49%, 51,836 samples	166x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	162x
Pentium B950IntelBench 43%, 7,305 samples	71x

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	239x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	165x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	123x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	18x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	13x

RAM
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	52x
M471B5273CM0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 871 samples	35x
QUM3S-8G1333C9 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 22 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16