Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150 20,066 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 0.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Memory 56.3 1-Core 45 2-Core 36.7 33% 46 Pts	4-Core 59.1 8-Core 95.6 9% 77.3 Pts	64-Core 53.7 3% 53.7 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1297 2020) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.23 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 0.84 1% 1.31 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 2.22 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB 12,615 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 178GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 382 386 310 246 247 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 418 Write 383 Mixed 334 SusWrite 320 82% 364 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 13.8 69% 24.2 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 34.6 60% 116 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 240%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 1x4GB 342 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	23.7% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7.8 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.8 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.7% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	5x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	4x

SSD
512GB 512GBSSDBench 87%, 6,819 samples	5x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
256GB 256GBXraydiskBench 86%, 1,063 samples	1x

RAM
BCS0-DJ-F 2x4GBSNOAMOOBench 48%, 23 samples	5x
8JSF25664HZ-1G4D1 0194 SH564128FH8NZPHSCG 6GBUnknownBench 44%, 2 samples	2x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	1x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $469

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16