Razer Blade

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190521
Uptime11.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '20 at 08:00
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 133
56% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 324
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6374
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.91% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 7.38
6% 7.93 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 6.77
Splatting 15
10% 11.1 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.91%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.1% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 56.9
49% 60.4 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 61.6
50% 61.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,280
Write 25.5
Mixed 37.7
231% 1,115 MB/s
4K Read 352
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 4.8
541% 120 MB/s
Poor: 119% Great: 249%
Jmicron Generic 256GB
237GB free
Firmware: 1507
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 37.2
Write 40.5
Mixed 38.7
9% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 11.2
37% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 11.7
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 12.3
9% 12.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 78%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80.5
Write 120
Mixed 64
66% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.7
209% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 69%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
897GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 96
Mixed 81
70% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 19.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback