Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MZGLKAP-00 (all builds)
Memory	3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190319
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '20 at 23:01
Run Duration	221 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	Memory 27.5 1-Core 49.1 2-Core 97 31% 57.9 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 180 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 169 10% 169 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 1000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.51% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.12 Parallax 2.31 2% 2.61 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 6.04 4% 4.15 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.51% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
m.2 Smartbuy PS5013-2280T 128GB 174 User benchmarks, average bench 143% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: EDFM00E3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 232 120 120 121 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	85.5% Excellent	Read 493 Write 417 Mixed 443 SusWrite 186 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 31.9 4K Write 51.3 4K Mixed 39.6 126% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 433 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 317 240% 328 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 85.5% Great: 197%
Apacer AS350 120GB 2,135 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 110GB free Firmware: AP613PE0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 247 58 58 57 57 MB/s Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54% Above average	Read 268 Write 239 Mixed 219 SusWrite 118 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 20.7 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 21.4 87% 31.9 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 160 136% 196 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 82%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 437 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 24GB free, PID 4300 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 2.6 2.8 2.7 3.9 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	6.19% Terrible	Read 29 Write 10.5 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 3.7 12% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.4 66% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.19% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GB 54,777 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21.8% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 269 15% 269 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 74%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 39%

Jet ski

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	24x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	24x

SSD
M.2 PCIe SSD 256GBSpccBench 162%, 15,205 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
CT4G4SFS824A.C8FF 2x4GBCrucialBench 72%, 238 samples	3x
CT4G4SFS824A.C8FG 2x4GBCrucialBench 54%, 50 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 322 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16