Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4105 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 36% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	40.3% Average	Memory 44.9 1-Core 53.8 2-Core 105 39% 67.9 Pts	4-Core 205 8-Core 210 28% 208 Pts	64-Core 212 13% 212 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 42%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.37% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 3.31 Parallax 2.5 2% 2.72 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 5 3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.37% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB-$20 12,702 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1120A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 326 355 372 50 73 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	64.3% Good	Read 430 Write 364 Mixed 328 SusWrite 248 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 15 78% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 80.2 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 38.2 76% 146 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 1x8GB 535 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26% Poor	MC Read 9.5 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 10.6 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4105IntelBench 36%, 1,216 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	5x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
750 EVO 250GBSamsung $55Bench 94%, 75,831 samples	1x
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples	1x
128GB 128GBIntensoBench 66%, 1,805 samples	1x

RAM
CT4G4SFS824A.M8FG 2x4GBCrucialBench 69%, 62 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 72%, 322 samples	1x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBG.SKILLBench 39%, 1,390 samples	1x

Value: 19% - Very poor

Total price: $55

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16