Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 92.4 2-Core 174 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 351 8-Core 608 58% 480 Pts	64-Core 1,638 101% 1,638 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Lighting 65.9 Reflection 70.7 Parallax 85.5 54% 74 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 69.9 Splatting 58.1 53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: 023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 396 392 382 377 375 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 410 Write 406 Mixed 399 SusWrite 389 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 78.9 4K Mixed 43.7 143% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 217 DQ Mixed 218 173% 243 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 368GB free Firmware: 023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 400 394 385 380 380 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 443 Mixed 427 SusWrite 392 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 35.9 4K Write 81.7 4K Mixed 45.3 156% 54.3 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 218 171% 236 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1TB free Firmware: CC1H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 119 Write 121 Mixed 65.6 76% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G6D1 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G6D1 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G6D1 18ASF2G72PDZ-2G6D1 Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF Samsung M393A2K40CB2-CVF 128GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	103% Outstanding	MC Read 47.5 MC Write 35.8 MC Mixed 39.1 117% 40.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 19.9 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 77.6 52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v31stBench 68%, 827 samples	4x
Xeon E5-2683 v4IntelBench 68%, 398 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	2x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	2x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	2x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x
SA2000M8250G 250GBKingstonBench 171%, 42,173 samples	2x
WDS100T1XHE-00AFY0 1TBBench 407%, 4,117 samples	2x

RAM
M393A4K40BB1-CRC 8x31.9GBSamsungBench 115%, 118 samples	2x
HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 8x16GBHynixBench 112%, 348 samples	2x
M393A1G40EB1-CRC 8x8GBSamsungBench 113%, 66 samples	2x

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $42

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16