Asrock 970 Performance/3.1

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	81% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock 970 Performance/3.1 (all builds)
Memory	29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160126
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '20 at 21:45
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-9590-$298 26,109 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 59.6 1-Core 73.2 2-Core 140 52% 90.9 Pts	4-Core 256 8-Core 450 43% 353 Pts	64-Core 446 28% 446 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan X-$615 15,621 User benchmarks, average bench 75% EVGA(3842 2992) CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	81% Excellent	Lighting 104 Reflection 115 Parallax 101 84% 106 fps	MRender 90 Gravity 99 Splatting 85 74% 91.4 fps
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 340 380 413 413 421 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 445 Write 416 Mixed 340 SusWrite 375 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 47.2 154% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 274 DQ Write 236 DQ Mixed 256 192% 256 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 134%
Intenso Alu Line 16GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 11GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 3.7 2.7 3.7 3.6 3.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	7.6% Terrible	Read 35.9 Write 3.7 Mixed 11 SusWrite 3.3 13% 13.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 30% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 7.6% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	26.7% Poor	MC Read 9.8 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 8.7 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 7.5 21% 7.5 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 Performance/3.1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Performance/3.1

CPU
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	3x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	3x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
Premier SP550 240GBAdata $74Bench 79%, 29,295 samples	2x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	1x
Savage 240GBHyperX $120Bench 89%, 39,518 samples	1x

RAM
RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 55%, 3,028 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 9,036 samples	1x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 3,428 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $570

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16