Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium J4205 1,095 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Memory 25 1-Core 44.7 2-Core 68.4 26% 46 Pts	4-Core 137 8-Core 137 18% 137 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 505 2,850 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 36C4) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7757 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	1.68% Terrible	Lighting 2.07 Reflection 2.08 Parallax 1.53 2% 1.89 fps	MRender 2.05 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.43 2% 1.99 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.68% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 767GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 215 201 229 290 276 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.5% Good	Read 281 Write 15.9 Mixed 197 SusWrite 251 41% 186 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 28.3 99% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 177 136% 184 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-YK0 1x8GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	23.9% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.1 SC Mixed 4.1 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 286 14% 286 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Pentium J4205IntelBench 33%, 1,095 samples	4x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	3x
HD Graphics 505IntelBench 2%, 2,850 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBUndeBench 18%, 109 samples	2x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	1x
RMT3170MP68F9F1600 1x4GBUndeBench 18%, 189 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16