Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T7100-$99 1,343 User benchmarks, average bench 33% N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Memory 36.2 1-Core 15.2 2-Core 24.6 18% 25.3 Pts	4-Core 18.7 8-Core 30.4 3% 24.5 Pts	64-Core 23.5 2% 23.5 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Sony(104D 9005) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.14% Terrible	Lighting 0.27 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.19 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.14% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0627A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 154 66 11 40 15 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.3% Poor	Read 174 Write 140 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 73.7 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 12.1 34% 9.1 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 22.3% Great: 83%
Toshiba MK2035GSS 200GB-$285 1,108 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 327GB free Firmware: DK022A SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 22 23 22 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 22.1 Write 26 Mixed 16.8 SusWrite 22 16% 21.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	7.1% Terrible	MC Read 2.4 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.13 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 1.97 GB/s	Latency 221 18% 221 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.1% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16