HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory44GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 44GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory14.4 GB free of 44 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160427
Uptime5.4 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 19:55
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 193
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 393
49% 366 Pts
64-Core 505
34% 505 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 11BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.81
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
25.5% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 27.7
27% 27.8 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 33.4
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 25%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 1TB-$329
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 84 104 78 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 379
Write 287
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 88.6
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 27.7
98% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 76.3
DQ Write 87.1
DQ Mixed 73.5
58% 79 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 103%
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$240
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 120 94 106 117 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 75.2
Write 117
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 109
66% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 2TB
234GB free, PID 5071
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 40 38 39 40 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 38.8
Mixed 18
SusWrite 38.5
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 18ASF2G72AZ-2G1B1 18ASF2G72AZ-2G1B1 Samsung M391A1G43DB0-CPB Hynix HMA451U7AFR8N-TF 44GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.9% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 1,697 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $350
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback