Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	55.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3 624 User benchmarks, average bench 48% None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	63% Good	Memory 74.3 1-Core 70.6 2-Core 158 59% 101 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 315 40% 306 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 136GB 509 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s Performing below potential (51^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55.3% Above average	Read 90.9 Write 127 Mixed 127 26% 115 MB/s	4K Read 43.3 4K Write 58.7 4K Mixed 31.9 138% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 43.5 DQ Write 63.7 DQ Mixed 17.5 23% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 78%
Virtual HD 30GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 26GB free Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.1% Average	Read 129 Write 130 Mixed 129 29% 129 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 34.5 4K Mixed 23 77% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 64.4 DQ Write 64.1 DQ Mixed 32.5 33% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 14GB 9,406 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 512, 13824 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 17.2 53% 18.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.6 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 15.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,138x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,039x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	820x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	455x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	424x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16