Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FA_S430FA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 91% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FA_S430FA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X430FA
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190528
Uptime11.8 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 15:07
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 51%
CPU Throttled 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8145U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 96
2-Core 144
55% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 269
36% 270 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Asus(1043 1591) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 5.97
5% 5.93 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.63
Splatting 13.3
8% 8.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW256G8 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF003C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 151 210 207 192 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 344
Write 340
Mixed 237
SusWrite 196
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 15.2
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 21.3
72% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 202
172% 251 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 113%
SDHC Card 32GB
8GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 23 6.1 6.2 8.7 6.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
9.15% Terrible
Read 34.3
Write 23.5
Mixed 10
SusWrite 9.2
23% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.15%
Great: 22%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
55GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 15 14 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 19.6
Mixed 7
SusWrite 13.9
22% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
78% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 35%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB
58GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 3.6 11 18 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 36
Write 20.2
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 14.3
29% 23.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.5
96% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 859B CT4G4SFS824A.M8FF 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 18.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FA_S430FA Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X430FA_S430FA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback