Biostar P4M90-M7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardBiostar P4M90-M7  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '20 at 00:17
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 4400-$108
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1 GHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Memory 36.6
1-Core 11.5
2-Core 23
17% 23.7 Pts
4-Core 23.1
8-Core 23.2
3% 23.2 Pts
64-Core 23.3
1% 23.3 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.02E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 61 58 55 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 56.9
Write 55.9
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 57
39% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 35%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
8GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 4.1 5.2 7 8.8 7.7 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 18.7
Write 10.2
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 6.6
14% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 2.5
181% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
7.36% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 2
6% 2.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 1.9
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 219
18% 219 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback