Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 09 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 86%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 37.5
1-Core 29.9
2-Core 43
25% 36.8 Pts
4-Core 45.1
8-Core 59.6
7% 52.3 Pts
64-Core 58.5
4% 58.5 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 350
Sapphire(174B A013) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 40
Parallax 53
11% 44.5 fps
MRender 27.4
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 40.1
10% 34.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 10%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Lexar SSD 256GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 428
Write 344
Mixed 344
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 6.4
62% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 125
DQ Mixed 31.8
51% 98.7 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 126%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 16G-D3-1866-M 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.2
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 214
19% 214 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-F2A88XM-D3HP Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-D3HP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $123
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback