Toshiba dynabook T552/58FWM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemToshiba dynabook T552/58FWM  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120420
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 08:20
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3940XM-$344
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 27.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 211
57% 115 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 127
43% 268 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FB20) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.54
Parallax 3.38
4% 4.9 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 2.77
Splatting 9.26
6% 6.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 97 98 96 101 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 404
Write 300
Mixed 318
SusWrite 121
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 27.9
4K Mixed 20
68% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 262
DQ Mixed 202
169% 244 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 271
15% 271 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback