Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 month ago, 2 month ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10SCSR
MotherboardMSI MS-16R4  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 00:39
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.6% Good
Memory 58.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 215
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 702
66% 531 Pts
64-Core 696
47% 696 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12BD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 20
Reflection 143
Parallax 23.2
5% 62.1 fps
Gravity 18.7
Splatting 33.8
6% 26.2 fps
Poor: 5% Great: 7%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Liteon CL1-8D512 512GB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 201 113 117 124 151 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 1,201
Write 551
Mixed 224
SusWrite 148
116% 531 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 22.8
101% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 432
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 152
175% 304 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 104%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MS-16R4 Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 79%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R4

The Best.
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback