| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 58.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170330 |
| Uptime | 0.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 05 '20 at 17:55 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 54% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.8%
Good
|
58% 95.5 Pts
|
31% 222 Pts
|
15% 241 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
|
58.2%
Above average
|
59% 69.1 fps
|
56% 68.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 74 23 66 75 0.4 MB/s
|
27.5%
Poor
|
27% 120 MB/s
|
45% 14.5 MB/s
|
11% 14.6 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
188GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 141 142 154 178 MB/s
|
90.9%
Outstanding
|
99% 136 MB/s
|
124% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
7GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.8 3.7 3.6 3.5 3.4 MB/s
|
4.79%
Terrible
|
12% 10.4 MB/s
|
15% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.C8FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
57.8%
Above average
|
60% 20.9 GB/s
|
41% 14.2 GB/s
|
53% 75.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,908 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-K
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,112x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 637x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 553x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 838x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 467x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 366x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |