Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 16:15
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 89.2
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 150
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 467
44% 364 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 580
Nvidia(10DE 063A) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 0.72
2% 2.27 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 1.43
Splatting 3.04
2% 3.02 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 328 244 240 241 242 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 401
Mixed 324
SusWrite 280
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 73.8
4K Mixed 48.5
156% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 258
191% 250 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 134%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
479GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 124 120 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 136
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 132
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
716GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 117 121 120 119 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 55.7
Write 52
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 118
48% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 184 188 182 184 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 175
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 185
100% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 102%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.5% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 13.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback