Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5570-$70 1,343 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	Memory 94.8 1-Core 80.6 2-Core 151 67% 109 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 391 45% 350 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 75%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB 22,489 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: S9FM02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 59 52 41 58 58 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.6% Poor	Read 99 Write 63.3 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 51.7 16% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 12.3 54% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 25.8 DQ Mixed 12.9 14% 22.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 83%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 243GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 68 70 69 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 67.3 Write 56.3 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 68.5 44% 60 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 169GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 91 90 90 92 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	47.7% Average	Read 75 Write 74.8 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 90.5 54% 73.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 177% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.7% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	42.9% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.2 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 12.2 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 57.6 69% 57.6 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $377

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16