Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150323
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 11:59
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 85.9
1-Core 73.6
2-Core 140
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 429
43% 350 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 71.6
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 89.7
58% 76.9 fps
MRender 69.9
Gravity 72.4
Splatting 56.7
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 488
Write 422
Mixed 384
96% 432 MB/s
4K Read 39
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 48.4
159% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 258
194% 259 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
103GB free
Firmware: DXT09B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 243 243 245 246 246 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 469
Write 252
Mixed 170
SusWrite 245
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 24.3
106% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 52.8
90% 176 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136
901GB free
Firmware: SD1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 103 102 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 104
Mixed 53
SusWrite 102
67% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 100 99 102 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 110
Write 107
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 100
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
877GB free
Firmware: CC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 203 201 205 204 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 158
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 203
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 115%
Great: 112%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
3TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 135 134 134 134 132 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 56.8
Write 103
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 132
58% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.9
350% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 94%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$22
931GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 173 174 173 175 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 173
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 173
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.2
251% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 101%
Great: 103%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 118 122 121 119 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 138
Write 125
Mixed 102
SusWrite 121
90% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 67%
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$62
530GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 149 150 149 149 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 80
SusWrite 149
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2.5TB (2011)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 114 116 117 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 127
Write 104
Mixed 95.7
SusWrite 115
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.3% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 16.9
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR V FORMULA-Z - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $630
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback