Monster ABRA A5 V9.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V9.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V9.2
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 20:04
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 82.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 223
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 604
65% 516 Pts
64-Core 596
37% 596 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 850A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4587
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 41.7
Reflection 29.5
Parallax 39.9
34% 37 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 34.1
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$46
233GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 639 430 432 431 432 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,775
Write 1,339
Mixed 1,368
SusWrite 466
276% 1,237 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 74.3
266% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 849
DQ Write 1,087
DQ Mixed 808
654% 915 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 224%
Great: 238%
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 306 317 315 314 306 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 416
Mixed 365
SusWrite 319
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 93.1
4K Mixed 50.8
172% 60.6 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
14GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 12 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 54
Write 21
Mixed 15
SusWrite 10.9
28% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 9.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
36% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CB8GS2400.C8ET 04CB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 21.7
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 32.5
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V9.2 Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V9.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback