| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C09 |
| Motherboard | MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190904 |
| Uptime | 5.9 Days |
| Run Date | May 25 '20 at 10:15 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | MKD-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.2%
Very good
|
81% 145 Pts
|
59% 442 Pts
|
28% 450 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.5%
Below average
|
31% 34.7 fps
|
30% 36.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
92% 413 MB/s
|
122% 48.8 MB/s
|
73% 139 MB/s
| |
|
|
1,005% 1,403 MB/s
|
23,086% 184 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9905702-082.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
33.2%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
27% 9.43 GB/s
|
49% 82.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,340 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 2,311x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,500x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 291x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 635x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 462x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 356x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $359 |