Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO Mobile V5535 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU Z17M2.0
Memory	0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20080225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 24 '20 at 04:10
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5550-$180 1,461 User benchmarks, average bench 31% uPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	19.7% Very poor	Memory 34.3 1-Core 17.5 2-Core 23.9 18% 25.2 Pts	4-Core 31.4 8-Core 35.2 4% 33.3 Pts	64-Core 38.7 2% 38.7 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 37%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 80GB free (System drive) Firmware: 04.01G04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 19 14 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.37% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 20.2 Mixed 10.5 SusWrite 17.1 12% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.2 45% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.37% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	8.39% Terrible	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.3 MC Mixed 2.3 8% 2.67 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 2.2 6% 2.27 GB/s	Latency 231 17% 231 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.39% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16