Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 23 '20 at 21:29
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 198 72% 126 Pts	4-Core 321 8-Core 547 53% 434 Pts	64-Core 591 37% 591 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 8C95) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.4% Above average	Lighting 59.6 Reflection 62 Parallax 56.9 49% 59.5 fps	MRender 67.2 Gravity 62.8 Splatting 66.8 54% 65.6 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 229GB free (System drive) Firmware: 411040WD Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 431 Write 396 Mixed 303 84% 377 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 35.4 125% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 235 DQ Mixed 124 129% 213 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 111%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 550GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,607 Write 35.2 Mixed 66.5 886% 1,236 MB/s	4K Read 485 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.2 20,483% 163 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
SanDisk Ext SSD 256GB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 180GB free, PID 5589 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 40.5 Write 29.5 Mixed 21 36% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 3.5 283% 4.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 121%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB 26,065 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	MC Read 24.6 MC Write 22.3 MC Mixed 18.9 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 16 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 84.6 47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	1,184x
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	84x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	570x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	77x
RTX 3060Nvidia $275Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	73x

SSD
Green 120GB (2016)WD $84Bench 53%, 21,990 samples	380x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	49x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	39x

RAM
DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 76%, 26,065 samples	726x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	96x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $370

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16