Asus G30AB

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	60.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G30AB (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G30AB
Memory	23 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140314
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 19 '20 at 11:34
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	NOR-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 79.8 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 178 69% 118 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 555 54% 443 Pts	64-Core 558 34% 558 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Lighting 75.7 Reflection 77.1 Parallax 72.4 62% 75.1 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 71.2 Splatting 72.7 59% 71.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0CB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 123 144 120 55 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Read 453 Write 427 Mixed 355 SusWrite 108 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 37.9 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 37.6 124% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 50.2 DQ Mixed 139 120% 188 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 382GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 128 148 172 172 194 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	69% Good	Read 473 Write 334 Mixed 351 SusWrite 162 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 39.5 4K Write 23.8 4K Mixed 30.3 111% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 231 DQ Write 37.6 DQ Mixed 43.2 55% 104 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 72GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 127 148 173 170 193 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 472 Write 419 Mixed 384 SusWrite 162 80% 359 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 34.8 4K Mixed 38.2 131% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 29.2 DQ Mixed 83.8 81% 136 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 124%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 4.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 124 144 170 167 189 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 7.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 125 146 168 164 186 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 328GB free, PID 1048 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 53 56 60 55 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 64.8 Write 63.3 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 57.6 75% 56.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 44%
LD-CT CT 8GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 5.1 5.5 5.9 5.3 6 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	7.89% Terrible	Read 10.5 Write 5.8 Mixed 7 SusWrite 5.6 9% 7.22 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.9 127% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.89% Great: 11%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1.5TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 97 106 116 105 118 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 48.8 Write 130 Mixed 110 SusWrite 109 149% 99.5 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 0.6 202% 4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 75%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 445 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 691GB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 76 84 92 83 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 87.2 Write 92 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 86.5 101% 75.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 0420 AO2L16BC8R2-BR2S 0215 CML16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.9% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 14.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 81 49% 81 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G30AB Builds (Compare 241 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: Asus G30AB

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	209x
Core i5-4670KIntel $127Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	25x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 760 (192-bit)NvidiaBench 20%, 10,656 samples	23x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	19x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	18x

SSD
RBU-SC400S37128G 128GBKingstonBench 70%, 864 samples	37x
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	25x
RBU-SC400S37256G 256GBKingstonBench 77%, 443 samples	11x

RAM
MI64C1D1629Z1 2x8GBAdataBench 54%, 2,816 samples	56x
SLB304G08-GGNHM 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 513 samples	25x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $120

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16