HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory	0.4 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120418
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	May 18 '20 at 13:24
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 215-$29 4,513 User benchmarks, average bench 38% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 47.8 1-Core 23.2 2-Core 51.8 27% 40.9 Pts	4-Core 55.9 8-Core 49.8 7% 52.8 Pts	64-Core 47.2 3% 47.2 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4200 10,090 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 3047) 368MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.54 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.79 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.13 Splatting 1.52 1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 26 23 6.2 62 14 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.8% Poor	Read 168 Write 100 Mixed 118 SusWrite 24.8 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 30.3 4K Mixed 13.2 49% 18 MB/s	DQ Read 18.4 DQ Write 52.2 DQ Mixed 21.7 20% 30.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 85%
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB 8,028 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 5GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 64.5 Write 60 Mixed 38 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5773DH0-CH9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-G7 37GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1333, 1066, 0 MHz 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 4.8 13% 4.7 GB/s	SC Read 1.5 SC Write 1.7 SC Mixed 1 4% 1.4 GB/s	Latency 169 24% 169 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

CPU
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples	53x
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples	44x
Phenom II X4 B97AMDBench 55%, 1,103 samples	22x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	150x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G 49GBUnknownBench 33%, 13 samples	4x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 37GBUnknownBench 28%, 75 samples	3x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 37GBUnknownBench 29%, 75 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16