Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '20 at 16:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 97.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 291
101% 181 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 614
78% 590 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 93%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.37% Terrible
Lighting 8.4
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 10
7% 10.5 fps
MRender 14.6
Gravity 7.53
Splatting 17.9
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.37%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 55.5
37% 47.8 fps
MRender 56.5
Gravity 52.4
Splatting 39.3
39% 49.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT23B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 353 357 324 351 356 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 463
Write 461
Mixed 391
SusWrite 350
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 68.3
229% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 128%
Great: 126%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
429GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 170 171 167 172 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 91.7
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 170
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 36
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 31.7
94% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 49.9
80% 49.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 111%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback