Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 65% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Razer Blade Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Blade Pro
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150210
Uptime	7.2 Days
Run Date	May 16 '20 at 17:53
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	65%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Memory 77.9 1-Core 50.4 2-Core 86.9 47% 71.7 Pts	4-Core 151 8-Core 242 24% 196 Pts	64-Core 234 14% 234 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 674C) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.14% Terrible	Lighting 4.13 Reflection 17.1 Parallax 7.09 3% 9.43 fps	MRender 9.67 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 8.26 6% 6.79 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.14% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE256HMHP-00000 256GB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT4100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 216 253 254 251 139 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 481 Write 261 Mixed 180 SusWrite 222 63% 286 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 60.3 4K Mixed 26.4 113% 39.2 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 81 112% 208 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 90%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB 66,048 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 431GB free Firmware: GR2OA230 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 112 110 111 111 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 116 Write 108 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 110 68% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 110% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	53% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 17.3 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 13.8 32% 11.2 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 64%

Destroyer

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 54%

Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	125x
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples	93x
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 95%, 17,197 samples	121x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	62x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	59x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	34x
Raid 0 Volume 1TBIntelBench 242%, 17,176 samples	32x
MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 121%, 3,154 samples	24x

RAM
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6B1 2x16GBMicronBench 86%, 409 samples	81x
M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 23,910 samples	61x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	45x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16